Air India 171: authorities need to prepare urban AQ networks for catastrophes

When news broke that an Air India Dreamliner bound for London had crashed into a residential area shortly after take off, images of the devastation spread quickly. 

Public attention rightly focused on the tragic human toll, with some 260 people now confirmed as fatalities.

But for air quality and public health professionals, the incident simultaneously raised urgent and complex questions: What was in that smoke? Who was exposed? And how do we measure and manage pollutants that fall well outside routine air monitoring?

Whether it’s a plane crash, a large explosion, an industrial fire, or a chemical release, the visible damage is only the beginning. 

These rare but high-impact events release complex cocktails of airborne pollutants—many of which evade standard detection methods.

Let's explore how city officials, environmental scientists, and public health professionals can prepare for and respond to the air quality threats posed by freak events and unusual pollution incidents.

If you need to monitor air quality, find your next instrument in our international directory of companies supplying air quality monitoring equipment.

1. Mobilising beyond the standard network

Urban air quality networks typically monitor VOCs, PM2.5, NOx, and SOx. But a major disaster introduces far more unusual pollutants, often at higher concentrations and in chemically complex mixtures. Rapid deployment of mobile monitoring units is crucial. These should be capable of tracking:

• Ultrafine particles (UFPs) and particle number concentration
• Lung deposited surface area (LDSA)
• Volatile aldehydes like formaldehyde and acrolein
• Carbon monoxide (CO) from incomplete combustion

Instrumentation must be ready to operate in a rapidly evolving, high-concentration pollution zone.

Portable & field testing

Could this novel spectroscopy revolutionise radiation, groundwater and gas sensing?

2. Accounting for rare and hazardous air toxins

Depending on the materials involved, unusual events may release a wide range of air toxics:

• Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) from burning synthetic foams and plastics
• Isocyanates and phosgene from insulation and refrigerants
• Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from incomplete combustion
• Dioxins and furans from burning chlorinated compounds

Additionally, metals such as titanium, chromium, and nickel from industrial equipment or aircraft components may become airborne as fine particles.

Routine ambient air stations do not capture these pollutants, requiring high-volume samplers and post-incident chemical analysis (e.g., via GC-MS).

3. Firefighting foam and chemical spill contamination

If firefighting foam, particularly AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam), is used to extinguish fires, there is a risk of airborne and surface contamination with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). 

Other chemicals used in fire suppression or from the initial event (e.g., ammonia, chlorine gas) can present acute airborne risks. Targeted sampling in downwind areas and buildings near the site is essential.

PFAS in water

Should we monitor TFA in water as a proxy for other pollutants?

4. Tying monitoring to public health

Air quality teams should coordinate with public health agencies through frameworks such as the Emergency Responder Health Monitoring and Surveillance (ERHMS) system. This includes:

• Roster tracking of exposed workers and residents
• Respiratory and toxicological screenings
• Long-term exposure surveillance registries

Lessons from previous disasters, including 9/11 and industrial incidents, show that initial underestimation of air toxics can lead to significant long-term health burdens.

5. Transparent data and public communication

Real-time data dashboards and public alerts help keep communities informed and safe. 

Communication should focus not only on pollutant levels but also on practical guidance: closing windows, using indoor air filters, and minimizing outdoor exposure.

It is essential to disclose both what is and what is not being measured to avoid false reassurance.

6. Post-incident monitoring: indoors and over time

Contaminants may persist as dust or vapor residues in nearby homes and businesses. 

Indoor air monitoring and surface sampling should be conducted for buildings within the fallout zone. 

Furthermore, long-term studies may be warranted to track possible chronic effects of chemical exposure, particularly for vulnerable populations.

Environmental laboratory

This algorithm for mass spectrometry data can identify unknown pollutants

A call to readiness

Freak pollution events are rare, but their impact on urban air quality and public health can be severe and far-reaching. By preparing mobile monitoring strategies, expanding analytical capabilities, and linking air data with public health response systems, cities and regions can better protect their populations when the unimaginable occurs.

Environmental health professionals, emergency responders, and air quality experts must ensure they have not only the instruments, but also the protocols, partnerships, and communication plans in place.

The smoke may clear quickly. But the airborne legacy of an industrial explosion, a crash, or a chemical fire demands far more sustained and sophisticated attention.