AN INTERCOMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOMATIC AND MANUAL METHODS OF MEASURING HYDROGEN CHLORIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN STACK RELEASES
Oct 06 2014 Read 173 Times
Free to read
This article has been unlocked and is ready to read.
The Environment Agency is involved in independent monitoring programmes at a variety of industrial processes where the permits require the measurement of hydrogen chloride (HCl) concentrations in stack releases. The programmes have revealed a number of difficulties associated with the currently used HCl monitoring techniques. Significant differences have been observed between results obtained using manual testing methods and those obtained using continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMs).
Consequently the Agency commissioned a project to compare and assess various measurement techniques under controlled and repeatable laboratory conditions. The work has been carried out by the UK’s National Physical Laboratory (NPL). The inter-comparison consisted of a series of tests involving CEMs and Standard Reference Methods (SRMs) using a test chamber developed for the purpose of instrument certification under the Agency’s Monitoring Certification Scheme (MCERTS). The facility delivered controlled traceable test gases to the analysers either in across-stack or in an extractive monitoring set-up.
The instrumental methods covered included the gas filter correlation (GFC), differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS), tunable diode laser (TDL), Fourier transform spectroscopy (FTIR)- medium and low resolution , and ion mobility mass spectrometry (IMMS). The two manual methods tested were SRMs as specified by EN1911 and US EPA method 26A.
The tests have demonstrated that in general the instrumental techniques perform well and produce much more repeatable results than SRMs. No major interferent effects were observed across all techniques. The SRMs were not challenged with gaseous chlorides which would have caused much greater discrepancies between the automatic techniques and the manual ones. The performance of SRMs puts a question mark over their use as a principal means of calibration of CEMs especially in view of possible interfering effect of gaseous chlorides.
Do you like or dislike what you have read? Why not post a comment to tell others / the manufacturer and our Editor what you think. To leave comments please complete the form below. Providing the content is approved, your comment will be on screen in less than 24 hours. Leaving comments on product information and articles can assist with future editorial and article content. Post questions, thoughts or simply whether you like the content.
In This Editon Business News - Measuring the methane component of GHG emissions - Blackline Safety reports strongest quarter ever with revenue up 64% - Restek and LECO collaborate in worldw...
View all digital editions
May 21 2019 Shanghai, China
May 22 2019 Rotterdam, Netherlands
May 26 2019 Helsinki, Finland
May 29 2019 Baku, Azerbaijan
Jun 02 2019 Atlanta, GA, USA