Health & Safety
Occupational Safety and Health: Workers and Industrial Safety Monitoring For Sustainable Work Environment Development
May 03 2013 Read 56560 Times
Free to read
This article has been unlocked and is ready to read.
Industrialisation and urban renewal has caused widespread problems relating to environments such as water, sanitation and health. At the same time exposure to indoor and outdoor environments has also given impact to the occupational safety and health whilst working. This is the scenario in the developed countries and the difficulty of how to implement a policy that will serve the whole spectrum. Firstly, what is the big concern about such issues, and the midst of so many other competing priorities, why should we bother to work on such issues? The WHO has estimated that 24% of global disease is caused by environmental exposures, with over 13million deaths annually due to environmental causes, nearly a third of deaths and disease in the least developed regions. So in this article, the Malaysian occupational safety and health scenario and related environmental aspect will be discussed.
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) is concerned with preserving and protecting human and facility resources in the workplace (Friend and Khon, 2007). OSH is also a field wherein professionals attempt to prevent catastrophic losses. Economically, morally, and legally, OSH has become an important issue. Companies are attempting to remain profitable in an ever competitive global economy. For companies, addressing safety, health and environmental programs, this may actually lean towards survival. In reality the amount of production required to cover costs associated with accidents in the workplace can be substantial and may far outweigh the expense of providing a safe and healthy working environment. The field of OSH has undergone significant change over the past two decades. Some of these reasons are: technological changes that have introduced new hazards in the workplace; proliferation of safety and health legislation and corresponding regulation; increased pressure from regulatory agencies; realisation by executives that workers in a safe and healthy workplace are typically more productive; increased pressure from environmental groups; corporate social responsibility and increased pressure from labour organisations and employees in general (Goetsch, 2010, Reese, 2009).
OSH Management Worldwide
Organisation worldwide strives to develop their management system for business functions, ranging from quality and environment to safety, information security and social responsibility. For the last decade a considerable amount of these efforts has been concentrated on introducing and applying standards such as the ISO 9001 and ISO14001 (Eriksson and Hansson, 2006). Numerous manufacturing and service organisations are considering integrating their respective occupational and safety management and audit systems into the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) based audit driven quality management system (ISO 9000), or environmental management system (ISO 14000) models (Dyjack et al, AIHA, 1998). The need for Integrated Management System (IMS) often arises as a result of decisions to implement Environmental Management Systems (EMS) and occupational safety and health management systems in addition to a Quality Management System (QMS). Thus the development of standards from various sources has emerged. A good example is the series of the OSHAS 18001: 2007 and OSHAS 18002:2008. The OSHAS 18001 is compatible with ISO 9001:2000 (Quality) and the ISO 14001:1996 (Environmental) management system standards, which can facilitate the integration of quality, and environment OSH management system individual organisation (BSI, OHSAS 18001:1999). Malaysia has also introduced the Malaysian standard and the latest is MS ISO 9001: 2008 and MS 1722: 2003. Malaysian Standards emphasises on the employers understanding and takes the opportunity to improve on the quality aspect.
People worldwide face occupational safety and health hazards daily. Over the years, the global occupational hygiene community has worked diligently to develop ways to protect workers, in workplaces of all types and sizes. Standards and guidelines were developed to help the employers and employees to develop their OSH Management system. However, laws and regulations may refer to certain standards and make compliance with them compulsory (British Standard, 2009). In this scenario certain standards were referred based on the Malaysian standard requirements. MS 1722: Part 1: 2005, Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems-Part 1: Requirements were established to guide the company on safety and health aspects. MS 1722: Part 2: 2003, OSH Managements Systems-Part 2: Guidelines were developed to give the understanding to the company and guidance to the employer to build up the Occupational Management System. From the environment aspect, the study will also look at the MS ISO 14001: 2004, Environment Management System (EMS) Requirements with Guidance for use.
OSH Malaysian Perspective
OSH provides a working environment which is conducive to workers. Reasonable precautionary steps are taken so as to ensure that workers are prevented from injury or health hazards due to work activities being carried out. Occupational safety and health (OSH) was first implemented in Malaysia some 130 years ago towards the end of the 19th century (DOSH 2007). The Department of Occupational Safety and Health is the only government agency responsible for administrating, managing and enforcing legislation pertaining to OSH in the country, with the vision of making all occupations safe and healthy whilst enhancing the quality of working life (OSHA, 1994). From the DOSH report, the industrial accident statistics are tabulated in Table 2.1. The data describes the number of industrial accidents occurred by sector from the year 2005 to 2010. It shows that the number of industrial accidents is quite high especially for the manufacturing sector.
Table 2.2 presents the total number of investigation cases of occupational diseases and poisoning. For the occupational disease, The Occupational Health Division monitors and analyses the data received. For each case of occupational disease and poisoning that is investigated, the department advises the industries to take corrective measures to prevent recurrence. To ensure the safety, health and welfare of workers; DOSH works towards making sure that the occurrence of industrial accidents in Malaysia is low, by introducing the OSH Master Plan 2015. This plan provides the direction of OSH in the country, and function as a guide for working cohesively with stakeholders and social partners, including government agencies, local authorities, labour unions, employer associations, academic institutions and other non-governmental organisations. The Small and Medium Industries (SMI) sector has been identified as the major source of accidents in the manufacturing industry. New strategies have therefore been introduced to reduce the accidents and to increase the level of awareness for the compliance with the Factories and Machinery Act, 1967 and Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1994.
Awareness of OSH Remains Low
OSH awareness is the main agenda to reduce industrial accidents and at the same time to prevent occupational diseases. DOSH and SOSCO, coupled with the involvement of the employer, employees and the public, must be continuous, comprehensive and integrated to increase the awareness of needs to create a safe and healthy workplace. This is necessary to ensure the quality of working life and the employer’s survival in occupational activities.
Eijkemans and Goelzer (2004) from the World Health Organisation (WHO) reported that observations in many countries, particularly developing countries, reveal that common constraints to the effective implementation of adequate control strategies include insufficient awareness, education and political will, shortage of adequate human and financial resources, deficiencies in information and in communication among professionals and institutions, inadequate preventive approaches, as well as failure to involve workers and their representatives directly in problem-solving processes. In the issues of OSH awareness, Kawakami (2009) reported that participatory approaches and good practice approches as keys for improvements. The government, workers and employers have been developing and practising innovative approches to reduce emerging OSH risks associated with globalisation whilst Kitumbo (2009) has reported that the number of accidents could be reduced considerably through enhancement of safety and health prevention measures. Even though the increase in economic activities is a desirable development, in most cases these activities are associated with numerous occupational safety and health hazards. Each person is entitled to safe and healthy conditions at the workplace. This, in turn, would result in increased productivity and well-being for the enterprises and an enhanced world economy .
Domestic and International Pressure
The domestic and international pressure according to OSH is justified, certain activities conducted by DOSH has shown their seriousness to protect the worker from OSH risk. One of the activities is OSH enforcement activities as tabulated in Table 2. 3 showing the inspection on the workplace from the year 2005-2008. The inspections were carried out to ensure factories observed the Factories and Machinery Act 1967. At the same time the OSH audits are a mandatory requirement. For 2008, 2,660 SMI work premises were inspected, 2772 workplaces were audited in 2007 and 2,411 for the year 2006. In doing so, the DOSH hopes to provide advisory services and lend a helping hand, especially for newly established SMIs. There are many enforcement activities carried-out under the Act 514. The enforcement activities conducted are those related with the enforcement of industrial hygiene. For the assessment and monitoring of chemical and physical hazards, the enforcement carried out is noise exposure, lighting, chemicals hazardous to health, air and heat stress.
Emergence of New Occupational Hazards
Despite the fact that people are working and spend most of their working hours at the workplace, little attention and resources are accorded to health and safety at work (A.M Leman 2008a). One way of improving health and safety issues at the workplace is the usage of practical tools ( Pule, 2008, A.Husain et.al., 2006). Practical tools are means that act as guides, instruments for developing occupational safety and health issues, in order to effect positive changes or address a challenge. The more mechanised a workplace is, the more challenges are to be found in keeping up with the speed of work and decision making. There are many tools and still more to come that will empower people to be well informed and to know how to avoid serious effect, or any effect at all, during their work life. These tools, if properly utilised by people in the world of work, can improve the quality of life. It is pleasing to realise that the tools and guides being developed include everything from identification of risks, including data collection and job safety analysis, to work setting application (Pule, 2008).
Acts and regulation for safety, health and Environment Protection and prevention
To prevent the industrial accident and environmental impact, the Malaysia government has implemented acts and regulations that are focused on the safety and health in the country. The acts implemented are:
i. Factories and Machinery Act 1967 (FMA 1967) with Regulations.
ii. Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (OSHA 1994) with Regulations.
iii. Environmental Quality Act 1974 (EQA 1974) with Regulations.
Factories and Machinery Act 1967 and Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994
Factories and Machinery Act 1967 (FMA 1967) is an act to provide the control of factories with respect to matters relating to the safety, health and welfare of people working there, the registration and inspection of machinery and the matters connected there. Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (OSHA 1994) was derived from the philosophy of the Roben’s Report and Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 in United Kingdom, a reflexive-type of Act which was less prescriptive, and also emphasis on duties of care by the individual. This act supports the philosophy of self-regulation for people at work and provides legislative framework for promotion, stimulation and encouraging high standards of safety and health at work. The Objectives of OSHA 1994 are to secure the safety, health & welfare of people at work, to protect other people at a place of work, to promote an occupational environment for people at work; which is adapted to their physiological and psychological needs and to provide means for Occupational Safety and Health legislation progressively replaced by systems of regulations and approved industry codes of practice. The scopes of applications are divided into the industrial sector such as:
• Mining & Quarrying
• Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing
• Utilities – Electricity, Water and Sanitary Services
• Transport, Storage and Communication
• Wholesale and Retail Trades
• Hotels and Restaurants
• Finance, Insurance, Real Estates and Business Services
• Public Services and Statutory Authorities
Environmental Quality Act 1974 (EQA 1974) with Regulations.
Environmental Quality Act 1974 (EQA 1974) was implemented for the prevention, abatement, control of pollution and enhancement of the environment, and for purposes connected therewith. In Malaysia, National Policy on the Environment which integrates the three elements of sustainable development: economic, social and cultural development and environmental conservation was formulated and approved in 2002. The Policy aims at continued economic, social and cultural progress and enhancement of the quality of life of Malaysians through environmentally sound and sustainable development. It is based on eight inter-related and mutually supporting principles set to harmonise economic development goals with environmental imperatives:
i. Stewardship of the Environment
ii. Conservation of Nature’s Vitality and Diversity
iii. Continuous Improvement in the Quality of the Environment
iv. Sustainable Use of Natural Resources
v. Integrated Decision-Making
vi. Role of the Private Sector
vii. Commitment and Accountability
viii. Active Participation in the International Community
In keeping abreast with the country’s rapid economic development and to meet with the nation’s aspiration for an improved quality of life, the National policy on the Environment serves as an important guide to all stakeholders to ensure that the environment is clean, safe, healthy and productive.
Safety and Health and Environment Culture
The greatest challenge is developing OSH programs (workers & Industrial safety monitoring) that are feasible in developing nations, as well as in small and medium industries (SMI’s) where resources and technical expertise may be very limited (WHO Gohnet, 2009). The health status of workers in small companies has been noted to be relatively poor (Yamataki et. al., 2006). There has been increased interest in trying to understand how management practices and other organisational factors impact workplace safety, health and environment. Current trends in society and work organisations are creating new risks and putting new demands on occupational safety and health research. Higher Learning Institutions (HLIs) can and should play a more active role in supporting national OSH efforts through the provision of pre employment education and training on OSH. It can work closely with industry, workplaces, NCOSH, DOSH, NIOSH, DOE etc. to integrate OSH into the academic syllabuses of relevant courses such as engineering, the sciences, medicine or architecture. Doing so will engender a strong preventive work culture among students from a young age. These institutions can also spearhead research into the relevant OSH areas, in partnership with the NCOSH and DOE. It can also act as a forum for discussion and sharing of OSH and DOE information. Together we support Malaysian Occupational Safety and Helath Malaysia Plan 2015 (OSH-MP15).
British Standard (BS) (2009). About Standards. London. United Kingdom.
BS EN ISO 14001:2004 (2004). Environmental Management Systems.
BS OHSAS 18002:2008. Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems.
Department of Occupational Safety and Health (2005). Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality. Ministry of Human Resource of Malaysia.Putrajaya.
Department of Occupational Safety and Health (2007). DOSH Annual Report, Human Resources Ministry of Malaysia, Putrajaya.
Department of Occupational safety and Health (DOSH) (2008). Annual Report. Putrajaya.
Dyjack.D.T, Levine, S.P and Holtshouser, J.L. (1998). Comparison of AIHA ISO 9001-Based Occupational Health and Safety Management System Guidance Document with a Manufacturer’s Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Instrument. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, Volume 59. No 6 p 419-429.
Eijkemans G. and Goelzer B. (2004). The practical application in developing countries; Outcomes of the planning meeting in Utrecht, The Netherlands, 13-16 June 2004. GOHNET Newsletter ISSUE No. 7 Summer 2004. World Health Organization. Geneva.
Environmental Quality Act 1974 and Regulations (2011). MDC Publisher. Kuala Lumpur.
Eriksson, H. and Hansson, J. (2006). “Integrated management systems – theoretical and practical implications”, The Asian Journal on Quality, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 69-82.
Factories and Machinery Act 1967 and Regulations (2011) MDC Publishers. Kuala Lumpur.
Friend M. A and Khon J. P. (2007). Fundemaentals of Occupational safety and Health. Fourth Edition. Government Institute. The Scarecrow Press, Maryland. United States of America . pp 1-7.
Goetsch,D.L (2010). The Basic of Occupational Safety.Prentice Hall. Pearson.New Jersey.pp.1-15
ISO 9001:2000 (2000). Quality Management Systems.
ISO 9001:2000 and MS ISO9001:2008.Quality Management Systems. Department of Standard Malaysia.
ISO 9001:2008 (2009), Quality Management Systems.
Kitumbo H. I. (2009). Accident prevention– a safe workplace. African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety Volume 19, number 1, April 2009 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH). Pp 3.
MS 1722: Part 1: 2005, Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems-Part 1: Requirements was establish to guide the company on safety and health aspect. Department of Standard Malaysia.
MS 1722: Part 2: 2003, Occupational Safety and Health Managements Systems-Part 2: Guidelines was developing to give the understanding to the company and guidance to employer to build up the Occupational Management System. Department of Standard Malaysia.
Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 and regulations (2012). MDC Publishers. Kuala Lumpur.
Occupational Safety and Health Master Plan for Malaysia 2015 (2009).Ministry of HumanResource,Putrajaya.
Reese C.D (2009). Occupational health and safety management : a practical approach. Boca Raton, Fla. ; New York, N.Y.: CRC Press, 2009.
SMIDEC.Annual report 2007. Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia.
Social Security Organization (2007). SOCSO Annual Report 2007, Social Security Organization, Kuala Lumpur.
Social Security Organization. (2006). SOCSO Annual Report 2006.Kuala Lumpur.
Thebe, A. Pule (2008). Practical Tools and Occupational Health and Safety, African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety. 18(2), 23.
Tsuyoshi Kawakami (2009). Good OSH practices to Create Healthy and Safe Workplaces. Asian Pacific Newslatter On Occupational Health and Safety. 16. (1), 3.
Yamataki, H., Suwazono, Y., Okubo, Y., Miyamoto, T., Uetani, M., Kobayashi, E. and Nogawa, K. (2006). “Health status of workers in small and medium-sized companies and compared to large companies in Japan”, Journal of Occupational Health, Vol. 48, pp. 166-74.
In This Edition Business News - New Partnership Opens up a World of CPT Opportunities - London Sets Aside £750,000 to Create the World’s Most Sophisticated Air Monitoring System - Study...
View all digital editions
Apr 25 2018 Mumbai, India
May 03 2018 Shanghai, China
May 07 2018 Chicago, IL, USA
May 08 2018 Brisbane, Australia
May 09 2018 Guangzhou, China