Air Monitoring

COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR CONTINUOUS, AUTOMATIC EMISSION DUST MONITORING

Oct 06 2014

Author: Roland Zepeck on behalf of CEM

Free to read

This article has been unlocked and is ready to read.

Download

Introduction

Automatic monitoring for particulates in gaseous medias is a special challenge, as the required answer from the monitors is a signal of Concentration, however, the matter to be detected is a mixture of two phases (stack gas = gaseous phase, particulates = solid phase), and such a mixture never can be ideal. Therefore in-situ methods avoiding the extraction of sample gas for measurement have a significant advantage over extractive methods. For extractive methods (including the reference method Isokinetic Gravimetric Sampling) the position of the extraction point (= representative point) is of vital importance for the accuracy of the measurement.

For automatic monitoring various methodologies are available. In general they can be grouped into several, partially also overlapping, groups:

Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

In-situ and Extractive Methods

Electrical and Optical Methods

Optical methods can be sub-grouped into Light-Transmission and Light-Scattering Methods.


Digital Edition

IET 34.2 March 2024

April 2024

In This Edition Gas Detection - Biogas batch fermentation system for laboratory use with automatic gas analysis in real time Water/Wastewater - Upcycling sensors for sustainable nature...

View all digital editions

Events

Analytica Anacon India & IndiaLabExpo

Apr 15 2024 Mumbai, India

World Future Energy Summit

Apr 16 2024 Abu Dhabi, UAE

Analitika Expo 2024

Apr 16 2024 Moscow, Russia

Ecomondo Mexico

Apr 17 2024 Guadalajara, Nexico

IE Expo China 2024

Apr 18 2024 Shanghai, China

View all events