COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR CONTINUOUS, AUTOMATIC EMISSION DUST MONITORING

Air monitoring

COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR CONTINUOUS, AUTOMATIC EMISSION DUST MONITORING

06 Oct, 2014

Published over 12 years ago. See the latest and most current information on Air monitoring.

Download

Introduction

Automatic monitoring for particulates in gaseous medias is a special challenge, as the required answer from the monitors is a signal of Concentration, however, the matter to be detected is a mixture of two phases (stack gas = gaseous phase, particulates = solid phase), and such a mixture never can be ideal. Therefore in-situ methods avoiding the extraction of sample gas for measurement have a significant advantage over extractive methods. For extractive methods (including the reference method Isokinetic Gravimetric Sampling) the position of the extraction point (= representative point) is of vital importance for the accuracy of the measurement.

For automatic monitoring various methodologies are available. In general they can be grouped into several, partially also overlapping, groups:

Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

In-situ and Extractive Methods

Electrical and Optical Methods

Optical methods can be sub-grouped into Light-Transmission and Light-Scattering Methods.

Latest White Papers

IET 36.5 Sept/Oct 2026

Explore our Digital Edition

Discover the latest news and research

Digital edition

Explore Our Other Sites

Labmate Online
Navigating Complexity: How Mid-Sized Teams Choose the Right Diagnostics CDMO Partner
Explore more Arrow
Pollution Solutions Online
Smarter wastewater management helps futureproof distillery operations and protect local watercourses
Explore more Arrow
Petro Online
A single viscometer for both conventional and renewable fuels
Explore more Arrow
Chromatography Today
Dr. Anupam Giri joins Chromatography Today as consultant editor to strengthen its technical expertise
Explore more Arrow