Air Monitoring

COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR CONTINUOUS, AUTOMATIC EMISSION DUST MONITORING

Oct 06 2014

Author: Roland Zepeck on behalf of CEM

Free to read

This article has been unlocked and is ready to read.

Download

Introduction

Automatic monitoring for particulates in gaseous medias is a special challenge, as the required answer from the monitors is a signal of Concentration, however, the matter to be detected is a mixture of two phases (stack gas = gaseous phase, particulates = solid phase), and such a mixture never can be ideal. Therefore in-situ methods avoiding the extraction of sample gas for measurement have a significant advantage over extractive methods. For extractive methods (including the reference method Isokinetic Gravimetric Sampling) the position of the extraction point (= representative point) is of vital importance for the accuracy of the measurement.

For automatic monitoring various methodologies are available. In general they can be grouped into several, partially also overlapping, groups:

Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

In-situ and Extractive Methods

Electrical and Optical Methods

Optical methods can be sub-grouped into Light-Transmission and Light-Scattering Methods.


Digital Edition

AET 28.2 April/May 2024

May 2024

Business News - Teledyne Marine expands with the acquisition of Valeport - Signal partners with gas analysis experts in Korea Air Monitoring - Continuous Fine Particulate Emission Monitor...

View all digital editions

Events

Chemical Indonesia

Jul 30 2024 Jakarta, Indonesia

China Energy Summit & Exhibition

Jul 31 2024 Beijing, China

IWA World Water Congress & Exhibition

Aug 11 2024 Toronto, Canada

World Water Week

Aug 25 2024 Stockholm, Sweden and online

View all events