Air Monitoring
COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR CONTINUOUS, AUTOMATIC EMISSION DUST MONITORING
Oct 06 2014
Author: Roland Zepeck on behalf of CEM
Introduction
Automatic monitoring for particulates in gaseous medias is a special challenge, as the required answer from the monitors is a signal of Concentration, however, the matter to be detected is a mixture of two phases (stack gas = gaseous phase, particulates = solid phase), and such a mixture never can be ideal. Therefore in-situ methods avoiding the extraction of sample gas for measurement have a significant advantage over extractive methods. For extractive methods (including the reference method Isokinetic Gravimetric Sampling) the position of the extraction point (= representative point) is of vital importance for the accuracy of the measurement.
For automatic monitoring various methodologies are available. In general they can be grouped into several, partially also overlapping, groups:
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
In-situ and Extractive Methods
Electrical and Optical Methods
Optical methods can be sub-grouped into Light-Transmission and Light-Scattering Methods.
Digital Edition
IET 34.2 March 2024
April 2024
Gas Detection - Biogas batch fermentation system for laboratory use with automatic gas analysis in real time Water/Wastewater - Upcycling sensors for sustainable nature management - Prist...
View all digital editions
Events
Apr 30 2024 Melbourne, Australia
Apr 30 2024 Birmingham, UK
May 03 2024 Seoul, South Korea
May 05 2024 Seville, Spain
May 06 2024 Minneapolis, MN, USA