Environmental Laboratory

  • How Does the World Cup Impact the Environment?

How Does the World Cup Impact the Environment?

Jun 12 2018 Read 3500 Times

The World Cup is labelled by many as the greatest show on Earth. And rightly so. It’s the biggest event for the most popular spectator sport in the world. But with all the ecstasy, agony and edge-of-your-seat action, the environment is hardly at the front of people’s minds.

That said, there is plenty to be considered for the environmental ups and downs of the pinnacle of international football. Read on as we look at the environmental impact of the World Cup.

Germany sets the example

Over the past 15 years or so, a number of sporting events have tried to market their sustainability. It’s no surprise. As we’ve become more aware of climate change and the need for sustainability, promoting a green ethos to a world cup can only boost a potential host country’s bid.

But it’s incredibly difficult to keep up with that sustainable attitude when most World Cup hosts are required to build multiple stadiums in the space of less than a decade.

Germany’s 2006 effort was arguably a stand-out success with free public transport for fans, free bicycle parking and multiple stadiums using solar power and rainwater collection. That, combined with a relatively short distance for fans to travel between games and FIFA’s carbon offsetting programme, resulted in the first ever carbon neutral World Cup.

The not so green cup

Unfortunately, that wasn’t an example other countries could match. Four years later, the South Africa world cup accounted for eight times the emissions of Germany’s.

In Brazil (2014), FIFA invested in solar panels, water conservation and waste reduction among other initiatives around the 12 World Cup stadia. However, critics have suggested that there was no effort to tackle the impact on the rest of the country during the “Copa Verde” – or, Green Cup.

The 2018 World Cup, held in Russia, was the first world cup subject to FIFA’s new green certification requirements for stadia. And, yes, the 12 stadia used less energy and water, and were built with reduced impact on the environment.

At the same time, however, FIFA’s carbon offsetting scheme was called into question, with a study suggesting that only 7% of its emissions reductions were likely to deliver real, measurable results. Find out more about pollution measurement in the article ‘New Wide-Ranging Particulate Sensor’.

2022 and beyond

Looking to the future, Qatar has announced that the 2022 World Cup will be carbon-neutral. Qatari officials aim to reduce water and electricity consumption, along with total carbon emissions, before the beginning of the tournament. Already, however, the carbon-neutrality of their stadia has been called into question.

Will the claims of carbon-neutrality materialise? Like the eventual outcome of the World Cup itself, it seems only time will tell.

Reader comments

Do you like or dislike what you have read? Why not post a comment to tell others / the manufacturer and our Editor what you think. To leave comments please complete the form below. Providing the content is approved, your comment will be on screen in less than 24 hours. Leaving comments on product information and articles can assist with future editorial and article content. Post questions, thoughts or simply whether you like the content.

Post a Comment




Digital Edition

International Environmental Technology April 2019

April 2019

In This Edition Business News - New appointment to boost noise and vibration specialists - Restek and LECO collaborate in worldwide supply agreement - Evonik catalyst in the life support sy...

View all digital editions

Events

64th ISA Analysis Division Symposium

May 05 2019 Galveston, TX, USA

Ozwater 2019

May 07 2019 Melbourne, Australia

ENVEX

May 15 2019 Seoul, South Korea

FlowExpo 2019

May 16 2019 Guangzhou, China

AIHce 2019

May 20 2019 Minneapolis, MN, USA

View all events