EN14181 Stationary Source Emissions - Quality Assurance of Automated Measuring Systems
Apr 03 2014 Read 7442 Times
EN14181 has now been in operation for 10 years and has had far-reaching consequences for Regulators, Equipment Manufactures, Test Houses and, most importantly, Process Operators.
The Standard describes the quality assurance procedures needed to assure that Automated Measurement Systems (AMS) installed to measure emissions to air are capable of meeting the uncertainty requirements on measured values given by legislation; e.g. EU Directives and BREF documents. The standard is currently under review and a revised version should be published this year.
Three different Quality Assurance Levels (QAL 1, QAL 2, and QAL 3) are described. These cover the suitability of an AMS for its measuring task (e.g. before or during the purchase period of the AMS) QAL 1 (EN 15267), the validation of the AMS following its installation QAL 2, and the control of the AMS during its ongoing operation on an industrial plant QAL 3. An Annual Surveillance Test (AST) is also defined.
The suitability evaluation of the AMS and its measuring procedure are described in EN15267 (QAL 1) where a methodology is given for calculating the total uncertainty of AMS measured values. This total uncertainty is calculated from the evaluation of all the uncertainty contributions arising from its individual performance characteristics.
EN14181 specifies procedures for establishing quality assurance levels QAL 2, QAL 3 and AST for an AMS installed on industrial plants for the determination of the flue gas components and other flue gas parameters. It supports requirements in the EU Industrial Emission Directive 2010/75/EU and the related BREF documents.
This standard specifies:
• A procedure (QAL 2) to calibrate the AMS, following its installation, and to determine the ‘variability’ of the measured values obtained by the AMS. Various functional checks must be performed before the QAL2 is undertaken.
• A procedure (QAL 3) to maintain and demonstrate the required quality of the measurement results during the normal operation of an AMS, by checking that the zero and span characteristics are consistent with those determined during QAL 1 (drift checking).
• A procedure for the annual surveillance tests (AST) of the AMS in order to evaluate (i) that it functions correctly and its performance remains valid and (ii) that its calibration function and variability remain as previously determined. Functional checks are, again, required before the QAL2 is undertaken.
This standard is designed to be used after the AMS has been accepted according to the procedures specified in EN15267.
This standard is restricted to quality assurance (QA) of the AMS, and does not include QA of the data collection and recording system of the plant.
Tests in detail
The QAL 2 and AST procedures involve the testing laboratories who have to have ISO 17025 accreditation (UKAS in the UK), whereas the QAL 3 procedures involve the plant operators.
QAL 2 is a procedure for the determination of the calibration function and its ‘variability’, and a test of the ‘variability’ of the measured values of the AMS compared with the uncertainty given by legislation. The ‘variability’ is a measure of the scatter of data around the calibration line. The QAL 2 tests are performed on suitable AMS that have been correctly installed and commissioned. A calibration function is established from the results of a number of parallel measurements performed with a Standard Reference Method (SRM) these methods are stated in the various CEN and ISO standards. The variability of the measured values obtained with the AMS is then evaluated against the required uncertainty.
The QAL 2 procedures are repeated either: periodically; after a major change of plant operation; after a failure of the AMS or as required by legislation.
The AST is a procedure designed to evaluate whether the measured values obtained from the AMS still meet the required uncertainty criteria – as demonstrated in the previous QAL 2 test. It also determines whether the calibration function obtained during the previous QAL 2 test is still valid. The validity of the measured values obtained with the AMS is checked by means of a series of functional tests as well as by the performance of a limited number of parallel measurements using an appropriate SRM. Refer Figure 1.
Figure 1 Quality Assurance Flowchart
Tests required by QAL 2 & AST
Testing shall cover the following items:
• Installation of the AMS;
• Calibration of the AMS by means of parallel measurements with a SRM;
• Determination of the variability of the AMS, and the check of compliance with the required uncertainty.
The sequence of the combined tests is shown in figure 2.
Figure 2 Sequence of testing for QAL2 & AST
Frequency of tests
A full QAL 2 procedure shall be performed at least every 5 years for every AMS and more frequently if so required by legislation (Incineration of Waste specifies parallel measurements every 3 years). In addition, after each major change in plant operation (e.g. change in flue gas abatement system or change of fuel) or major changes in the set-up of the AMS, a full QAL 2 for the components influenced by the change shall be performed and reported within 6 months after the changes. During the period before a new calibration function has been established the previous calibration function (where necessary with extrapolation) shall be used.
A Standard Reference Method (SRM) is used to sample the emissions at a point in the duct that is as close as possible to the AMS, without interfering with its operation, having demonstrated that the sampling location is representative by means of duct surveys performed according to EN 15259. The duration of the SRM sampling shall be identical to the duration of measurement made by the AMS.
The AST is carried out on the anniversary of the first QAL2 tests and subsequently every year up until a new QAL2 is required.
Functional tests of the AMS required by QAL2 and AST
One of the major challenges in carrying out successful QAL2 and AST is the organising of the functional tests, usually carried out by the AMS supplier.
Table 3 shows the function tests that must be carried out for QAL2 and AST.
The details of the tests are as follows.
Alignment and cleanliness
A visual inspection, with reference to the AMS manuals, shall be carried out on the following when applicable:
• internal control of analyser
• cleanliness of the optical components
• flushing-air supply
• obstructions in the optical path
After re-assembly at the measurement location at least the following shall be checked:
• alignment of the measuring instrument
• contamination control (internal control of optical surfaces)
• flushing air supply
A visual inspection of the sampling system shall be performed, noting the condition of the following components, when fitted:
• sampling probe
• gas conditioning systems
• all connections
• sample lines
• power supplies
The sampling system shall be in good condition and free of any visible faults, which would decrease the quality of data.
Documentation and records
The following documentation shall be controlled, readily accessible and up do date:
• General arrangement and schematic of the AMS
• All manuals (maintenance, users, etc.)
• Log books
• Possible malfunctions and action taken
• Service reports
• QAL 3 documentation
• Actions taken as a result of out of control situations
• Management system procedures for maintenance, calibration
• Training records
• Maintenance schedules
• Auditing plans and records
There shall be provisions for the effective management and maintenance of the AMS, in order to ensure the maintenance of the quality of data. Such provisions include at least the following:
• Safe and clean working environment with sufficient space and weather protections
• Easy and safe access to the AMS itself
• Adequate supplies of calibration materials, tools and spare parts
Leak testing shall be performed according to the AMS manuals. The test shall cover the entire sampling system.
Zero and span check
Reference zero and span materials shall be used to verify the corresponding readings of the AMS.
In case of non-extractive AMS zero and span checks shall be performed on a waste gas free reference path before and after the readjustment and after re-assembly of the AMS at the measurement location.
The linearity of the analyser’s response shall be checked using five different reference materials, including a zero concentration.
The reference material with zero concentration, as well as the reference materials with four different concentrations, shall be traceable.
In case of gaseous reference materials, these four reference materials can be obtained from different gas cylinders or can be prepared by means of a calibrated dilution system from one single gas concentration.
The reference material concentrations shall be selected such that the measured values are at approximately 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% of the range of two times the emission limit. It is necessary to know the values of the ratios of their concentrations precisely enough so that an incorrect failure of the linearity test does not occur. The dry test reference material shall be applied to the inlet of the AMS.
The individual analysers are tested using the following concentrations applied in a randomised sequence:
• reference material with zero concentration
• reference material concentration approximately 20% of 2 times the emission limit
• reference material concentration approximately 40% of 2 times the emission limit
• reference material concentration approximately 60% of 2 times the emission limit
• reference material concentration approximately 80% of 2 times the emission limit
• reference material with zero concentration
After each change in concentration, the first instrument reading shall be taken after at least three times the response time of the AMS. At each reference material concentration, at least three readings shall be made. The time period between the start of each of the three readings shall be separated by at least four times the response time.
The linearity shall be calculated and tested using the procedure given in annex B of the standard. If the AMS does not pass this test, then the problem shall be identified and solved.
A test shall be undertaken if the process gases to be monitored contain components that are known interferences, as identified during QAL 1. This may not be required if the process concentration of the interferents are within those tested during certification.
Zero & span drift (audit)
The zero point and span drift shall be obtained from and evaluated on the basis of the records of QAL 3.
The response time of the AMS shall be checked. This can be performed, if appropriate, by feeding of the reference material at the end of the sampling probe. The response time shall not exceed the measured value that has been identified during QAL 1.
The results of the functional test shall be reported. Any faults shall be recorded. If the faults are judged to have an effect on the quality of data, then the operator shall carry out the necessary corrective and preventive action.
EN 14181 is a complex standard with far reaching consequence it relies on a high degree of co-operation by all parties involved i.e. Process Operator, Test House, AMS supplier’s service department and the regulator. We have seen that when corners are cut additional costs are incurred. By planning the project carefully, with all parties involved from the outset, good consistent results from the AMS can be achieved.
Industrial Emission Directive 2010/75/EU
BREF Documents available from http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/
EN 14181 - Stationary source emissions - Quality assurance of automated measuring systems
EN15267 parts 1 to 3 Air Quality – Certification of automated measuring systems
PD CEN TR 15983 2010 Stationary source emissions - Guidance on the application of EN14181
Environment Agency Technical Guidance Note M1
Environment Agency Technical Guidance Note M2
Environment Agency Technical Guidance Note M20
All Environment Agency Documents are available from www.mcerts.net
Do you like or dislike what you have read? Why not post a comment to tell others / the manufacturer and our Editor what you think. To leave comments please complete the form below. Providing the content is approved, your comment will be on screen in less than 24 hours. Leaving comments on product information and articles can assist with future editorial and article content. Post questions, thoughts or simply whether you like the content.
In This Edition Business News - New appointment to boost noise and vibration specialists - Restek and LECO collaborate in worldwide supply agreement - Evonik catalyst in the life support sy...
View all digital editions
Apr 25 2019 Bangkok, Thailand
May 05 2019 Galveston, TX, USA
May 07 2019 Melbourne, Australia
May 15 2019 Seoul, South Korea
May 16 2019 Guangzhou, China